Crimes and Ethical Dilemmas in the News

Crimes and Ethical Dilemmas in the News

Spread the love

Two items in Sunday’s papers caught my interest, and possibly yours.  “Metro edict choking Phantom Planter’s blooms” in the Washington Post really warmed my heart – except for the part about Metro.  Part-time lawyer Henry Doctor has been planting flowering plants in the 176 otherwise abandoned little planters along the escalator leading to the Dupont Circle subway station (aka Metro).   I’ve ridden those multi-story escalators and very much appreciated the plants, and had no idea a volunteer gardener was to thank for  them.  Trouble is, he asked for permission and was told he’d face “arrest, fines and imprisonment” if he continued to tend to the 1,000 flowers he planted there.  (By the way, the story doesn’t tell us why they’re abandoned.  For at least 20 years they contained groundcover Junipers and looked terrific.)

The back story is that the Phantom Planter here has has been quietly performing “clandestine horticulture” for 34 years, with no trouble.  He’s planted 40,000 flowers far and wide – at embassies and memorials, even in other countries, like Cambodia, Argentina.  He tells the Post, “I’m not denying that I’m a little nuts”.  I say, nuts in the best possible way.  He’s the son of a well-known District community activist, and I guess he sees beautification as a form of community activism, which I certainly think it is.

Until now he’s stayed under the radar, but since his citation has gone public with this website, which is bringing attention and support for his cause, as have other online campaigns to protest anti-gardening laws and regulations.  (Think HOAs and cities that require all-grass front yards.)  Doctor is respecting Metro’s order that he stop watering the plants (Metro cites safety concerns), but he’s worried.  He’s a gardener.  When there’s no rain, we fret.

Next, in “Horticulture Heist, the New York Times’ Ethicist was asked to weigh in on the ethics of taking cuttings from plants in a shopping center – which plants could not be found at any store, we’re told.  So, is this stealing?  The Ethicist’s considered opinion is that if he were to place unethical acts on an ascending continuum of 1 to 100, he’d give the cuttings-thieves “a 4.  Maybe a 3.”

One more thing.  This week’s New Yorker has a cool city garden on the cover, and click here to scroll through years of gardening-related covers.

Posted by

Susan Harris
on June 25, 2013 at 8:31 am, in the category Ministry of Controversy, What’s Happening.

    • admin
    • 4th May 2015

    Perhaps the government wants tiny security cameras there and devices collecting meta data?

    • John
    • 6th July 2015

    As to the “Horticulture Heist,” that’s just plain wrong on so many levels. Not finding a desired plant at 2 nurseries is a typical Saturday for most gardeners. Surely it was available mail-order somewhere.

    • Laura Bell
    • 26th October 2016

    While I agree with your statement “If public landscapes let everyone take a little piece instead of sourcing their own, there wouldn’t be much of a public landscape left”, I cannot let it go without comment that the number of people who would know what to do with a cutting is a very small fraction of the populace. So many seem to think gardening is difficult, requiring advanced knowledge, if not actual magic potions. Growing from a cutting? Pure voodoo!

    • gemma
    • 29th October 2016

    And then there are the people who pick flowers or fruit at community gardens and say, “It’s a community garden, that means it’s for everyone.” I have a big patch of echinacea and have started telling people who ask that it’s coneflower. One year a whole plant was dug up, and flowers were being cut a few times a week, so I put up bird netting and barriers along the path.

    • Laura Bell
    • 13th November 2016

    I think we all could go on & on about garden thievery … About people who pick fruit from the trees planted in the center of my lawn. No sidewalk overhang whatsoever. They trample the lawn – not that I’m overly fond of the grass, but hubby is … and it’s not theirs to trample!

    • Geoff Lewis
    • 13th November 2016

    I recall being told, when visiting a British garden often visited by busloads of blue-haired ladies, that they would descend like locusts onto uncommon cutting items (“Oh, I’m just taking a slip”) until the plants were fully dismantled. Common sport over there; guards would have to be temporarily posted.

    • Sandy in TX
    • 15th November 2016

    Re: Cuttings. When you take cuttings from a public planting (museum garden, sidewalk, etc.) – that’s tax money that paid for those plantings. As a taxpayer, I’d put that a little higher up the crime scale than 3. A plant in a private garden that’s actually hanging over the sidewalk/street getting in people’s way would be higher yet, but a little below walking into the garden itself to take plant matter. But if it’s someone else’s property, it’s someone else’s property whether it’s a withered flower or a diamond!
    Re: Mr. Doctor & Metro – if Metro’s concern is actually safety issues, why could they not ask him for proof of insurance, and to put up a “men working” sign? Metro’s reaction was not only extreme, but slightly bogus.

    • Karla
    • 15th November 2016

    What the Ethicist didn’t touch on was this relative new (in the plant world anyway) process of patenting plants. If those shopping mall plants were trademarked, then “propagation was prohibited”, to quote the legalize. So what the couple did was technically not only ethically wrong, but illegal as well.

Leave a comment

Recent Posts

Testing Pollinator Plants at Penn State

Connie Schmotzer is Principal Investigator for pollinator research. Just in time for National Pollinator Week, my Garden Writers region planned a fabulous outing for members – to see the Penn State Trial Gardens near ...

Read More